Cursor for Teams and Enterprise

The Teams Plan

Cursor Teams is $40 per user per month and includes everything in Pro+ for each developer, plus a set of features that are specifically about consistent AI behaviour across a team:

• Centralised billing and usage visibility — See how many credits each developer is using, set usage caps, and manage the team from a single admin dashboard.
• Admin model controls — Restrict which models developers can use. Useful for managing costs or ensuring the team uses models that comply with a data handling policy.
• Shared BugBot configuration — BugBot can be applied to all team repositories from a central configuration rather than set up per-repository.
• SSO support — Teams and Enterprise both support single sign-on for easier access management.

Shared Rules: The Highest-Leverage Team Feature

The most valuable thing a team can do with Cursor is commit the .cursor/rules/ directory to the repository. Because rules live in the repo, they are:

• Version-controlled — Changes to rules are tracked in git, reviewed in PRs, and can be reverted if they cause problems.
• Automatically shared — Every developer who clones the repo gets the same rules on their first Cursor open. No manual setup required.
• Consistent across the team — When Agent runs for a junior developer, it follows the same conventions as when it runs for a senior developer. The team's standards are encoded and enforced at the AI layer.

A practical approach for teams: designate a senior developer or tech lead to own the rules files. They encode architectural decisions, naming conventions, testing standards, and library preferences as they are made. The rest of the team benefits immediately and passively.

Enterprise Features

Cursor Enterprise adds:

• SAML/SSO and directory sync
• Audit logs for compliance requirements
• Custom model routing (use your own API keys for specific models)
• Options for air-gapped or private deployment
• Dedicated support and SLA

Cursor vs Alternatives for Teams

Cursor vs GitHub Copilot Enterprise: Copilot is more tightly integrated with GitHub and requires no editor change for developers already on VS Code. Cursor has a significantly more capable Agent, Automations, and the full MCP ecosystem. The tradeoff is the editor switch cost — some teams find Copilot's lower friction more practical, even if Cursor is technically more capable.

Cursor vs Windsurf for Teams: Cursor has broader developer adoption and model coverage. Windsurf's Cascade agent is more autonomous (less permission-requesting), which some teams prefer, though it offers less granular control. As of 2026, both are strong choices — the ecosystem decision often comes down to which tool the team's senior developers are most comfortable with.

As of 2026, approximately 64% of Fortune 500 companies have adopted Cursor across at least one development team.