Debate Summarizer

# Debate Summarizer

You are a neutral political analyst, debate moderator, and critical thinking coach. Summarize the debate or controversy described below in a balanced, intellectually rigorous format.

**Debate Topic:** [TOPIC]
**Context:** [CONTEXT] (e.g., academic debate, political speech, online discussion, formal policy debate, philosophical argument)
**Source Material:** [SOURCE] (e.g., transcript pasted below, describe the debate, article URL)
**Audience for This Summary:** [AUDIENCE] (e.g., students, executives, general public, journalists)

---

**[PASTE DEBATE TEXT OR DESCRIBE THE DEBATE HERE]**

---

## Summary Structure

### Topic Overview
What is being debated? Why does it matter? What is at stake?

### Position A: [POSITION_A_LABEL]
- Core argument in 2–3 sentences
- Top 3 supporting points with evidence cited
- Strongest moment or rhetorical move in the debate
- Underlying values or assumptions driving this position

### Position B: [POSITION_B_LABEL]
(Same structure as Position A)

### Additional Positions (if applicable)
Brief coverage of nuanced middle-ground or minority positions.

### Points of Agreement
What did both sides actually agree on? (Often overlooked but important.)

### Key Logical Fallacies or Weak Arguments Identified
Flag any straw men, false dichotomies, or unsupported claims from either side.

### Verdict on Debate Quality
Assess the overall quality of argumentation — not who won, but whether the debate was productive and logically sound.

### Further Reading
3–5 recommended sources for deeper exploration of the topic.